Posts Tagged ‘Deaf’

I Sing The Body Electric Part I

Change can be a conscious or it can be a subconscious process. Change can also be a pleasant process, joyful even, or it can be painful.

I’ve grown up with the idea that once I reached adulthood, I would know everything there is to know, and that I would use this wisdom and knowledge I received from my childhood and teenage years, to live a fulfilling and eventful life. And that I would die, knowing that my life was well spent, and I would leave behind a legacy.

My journey to understanding and discovering the person I am, started along time ago, long before I attended my first counselling session. It was while watching the movie, And Your Name Is Jonah, that I realised that there was more to being deaf than disability. Being Gay, played havoc with social expectations of normality. Which has set up enormous conflicts for me, which remain to this day. Meeting my Mountain Man, challenged my conceptions of what it means to be a man, and showed me that men can be close and intimate with each other. In  non sexual ways. From him, I learnt what it means to have a relationship with another person. That a satisfying relationship does not come from acting according to label, or holding a person to your expectations, but from being yourself. From also, allowing the other person to be themselves.

And being myself has been, and continues to be, one of the hardest things I do.

My true epiphanic moment came when I started reading the book, The Road Less Travelled, written by American psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, in the early 1990′s. I don’t know what made me choose this book. I had been eyeing it for a while, and I knew vaguely that I wanted to make some changes in my life, find myself, but simply did not how or who to ask. So, I ended up buying a copy. The book, for me, was a revelation. The Road Less Travelled made me realise that growth and learning are lifelong things.  And that is its strength. It does not pretend that change is easy. It makes the point, that change requires a committment. A committment to work for change. And that committment has to be for you, which in my case, is me.

And that is fucking hard. [I'm all knotted up inside as I write this].

But still, one must try. And I do.

I am certainly an opinionated guy, and if you have followed my previous blog, i.Mephisto: i.Muse.iAmuse, you will know this. The image I portray, is an amplified version of my natural exuberance.

I enjoy writing. I find it easier to express in print, what I could not say verbally because my mind ran too fast for my mouth to spew forth its inane utterings. I enjoy the persona, Mephisto, that I have created for myself, but it has become a straitjacket. Under the guise of Mephisto, I am constantly eyeing my subjects as targets, upon which to fire. To rain fire and brimestone, and cast them down to nether regions of hell.

It certainly is fun. It allows me to create. It allows me to play with words. Bend them to suit my purposes, perhaps give them new meanings. But being Mephisto, while good for a laugh, is limiting. It is not me. Only a part of me, and I certainly do not want to be on show 24/7!

Hence the discontinuation of i.Mephisto: i.Muse.iAmuse, and a focus on this blog. To continue the process of self discovery I initiated in counselling, the reconnecting with myself, and to strengthen that bond that I have re-established with myself.

October 27th, 2009 By Tony Posted in The Midnight Rambler

Boring As It Gets: The Aggergator Question PII

Since I wrote the post Boring As It Gets: The Aggregator Question, a few things that have been rather obvious, but not included in any discussion about aggregators, editorial policies, and online publishing. Not only that, some points need to be RE-emphasised, because people are blatantly missing the point.

I will address the issues in point form rather than my usual narrative. Of course, I will still do that Aussie thing, so you can be sure that you will be swimming in shark infested waters, walking online over run by funnel web spiders, redbacks, taipans and big noting myself [right Liam! ;-) ]

1. DeafRead: The Dashboard.

Sure, DeafRead’s feature allows a reader to filter what they want to read or watch according to personal preferences. But the content available to us is determined by DeafRead’s editorial policy and publishing guidelines. The same with deaf village. The effect their policies have is to actually dampen, rather than encourage blogging and vlogging. While there is some diversity present, in that deaf and Deaf viewpoints are being published, there is no sense of liberation that comes with freedom of expression. There is no sense of liberation that comes with sharing a unique viewpoint. It’s all circumscribed by editorial policies that state, it must be relevant to Deaf. Well, editors, everything I write about IS relevant to Deaf. I am Deaf, I know I am writing to a Deaf and deaf audience, and don’t need to repeat that face ad nauseam, in order to pass the publishing guidelines that allows my post to show up in the main feed.

2. Deaf People and Diversity.

Deaf people are diverse. Deaf people practice diversity. Deaf people are pragmatic. Deaf people are accepting of the implant. Deaf people are accepting of deaf people who use technology to be able to hear. Deaf people are actually talking to people with implants and learning to see [and accept their point of view]. Deaf people do experience things other than being Deaf. So, what is this beef about diversity? You mean, we need to accept that any space we set up, it must also be opened up to different viewpoints, all in the name of diversity. Do you mean, we need to accept oralist and disabled bullshit, without questioning they do? Do you mean that we do all the access work for people who have no intention of accepting, experiencing or participating in Deaf culture and sign language, let alone embrace it, on its own terms? Well, I have a picture of a bird here for you to look at and ponder. A rather unique bird. It looks like a fist with the middle finger sticking right up!

3. Deaf Aggregators: Culturally Specific

Enough has been said about this. It’s gunna come. It’s gunna happen. It’s gunna make you wet your nappies, over the lack of stories about mapping, the lack of stories about counting the days to the implant, the lack of songs praising Cochlear Implant Laboratories all the world over, the lack of, of, of, of, come to think of it, deaf village should be encouraging podcasts. Then we can see an outbreak of venom over the lack of accessibility to these podcasts. Captioned podcasts anyone?

4. Aggregators Achilles Heel

The problem with DeafRead, deaf village and other aggregators that implement CONTENT restrictive policies, is that they run the danger of becoming irrelevant. Serious bloggers would not rely on one publishing medium. That is true. Sure, DeafRead and deaf village serve as a one stop shop for Deaf and deaf related content, but their positions are being undermined, not just by their editorial policies, but also technology.

There are now services that allow you to publish to a wide range of feeds, exposing your content and blog to a wider audience. This does not mean there is no place for Deaf and deaf centred aggregators, but it does mean that, if you piss off the bloggers who embrace freedom of expression, they will go elsewhere, and that is happening. While waiting for the Deaf Centred Aggregator to get up and running, I use TwitterFeed, that allows me to publish to Twitter and Facebook, for example. These services are meant to complement the work of aggregators, not become a platform by which aggregators are deserted, allowing them to become a barren wasteland of irrelevant links.

5. Deaf People, Diversity, and Blogging

I am Deaf. My inclusion on DeafRead is a testament to that. So why do all my writings have to be OBVIOUSLY Deaf related? Why can’t I be free to write about anything at all, without reminding readers, viewers and people about my Deafness. Why isn’t my Deafness taken as granted by my inclusion on DeafRead? What can’t DeafRead be an open platform, with the ability to filter content based on the reader’s personal preferences and not the editors? Why is there this need for an old world hierarchal system that attempts to control the information flow? This issue deserves a blog post of it’s own, so I won’t blather about it here. But I’m sure you get the gist of what I am saying!

Related Posts:

Boring As It Gets: The Aggregator Question

Boring As It Gets

Boring As It Gets! Part II

Enough with the CI Blogs?

Powered by Zoundry Raven

Technorati : , ,
Del.icio.us : , ,
Zooomr : , ,
Flickr : , ,