Boring As It Gets!
I wondered someone was going to comment on the plethora of post about the CI and subsequent variations on a theme, and then Dianrez’s hit me with her blog post, Enough With Blog About CI Surgery.
I mentioned to a mate of mine, this past weekend, how bored I am with Deaf and deaf blogs. It seems us Deafies and deafies cannot write about anything but our deafness. I have to say, I’m basing this judgement on the blogs that appear on DeafRead and the deaf village aggregators. Both which must bear some blame for this, as their inclusion criteria exclude anything that is not OBVIOUSLY Deaf or deaf related. Their editorial criteria does not encourage the expression of diverse viewpoints. A has been stated many time sin the past, their editorial policies actively curtail the breadth of topics open to discussion, and crimping the bloggers writing style.
Having said that, it still begs the question though, are we capable of any other dialogue with each other, and the hearing world, other than the endless, and monotonous, drone that has characterised Deaf and deaf dialogue?
I don’t have a problem with blogs about hearing technology per se, and that there is room for all voices, and diversity is good. The information necessary. But there is no real thinking, let alone diversity, happening in the Deaf and deaf blogosphere. It seems that everyone is defensive [understandably]: justifying their deafness, their identity and their, whatever. That is all very well, but I can’t help shaking the feeling that deaf bloggers, in particular, are unwilling to delve into any serious analysis of their perspectives, their choices, and expectations of themselves and their relationship with the hearing world. Not in the way that many Deaf bloggers do.
deaf blogging is a cacophony of a 1000 dissenting voices all arguing for the freedom to express their individuality by thinking a like. Then again, I could be wrong. deaf blogs are like 1000 different brands of coffee all made by the same producer. [Source: My Brains]
Reading deaf blogs is like reading about people whose self esteem is so lacking, that the only way they are fulfilled as human beings is by talking and hearing. They greet any tool that plugs them into the holy grail that is the hearing world, with glorious shouts of "Hosanna!"
I quite agree that the ability to speak and use whatever residual hearing they have, makes a Deaf person’s life easier, not infinitely easier, but easier all the same. But the crux of all these stories, is how WE are making most of the effort to integrate, and participate in hearing culture, and losing ourselves in the process.
Then there is the recurring theme of abuse, from Deaf people, for their choices in communication and technology. I quite agree that bad behaviour is bad behaviour, and should not be tolerated. But, the impression I get is that is the assumption that such criticism and bad behaviour is an integral part of Deaf culture. Blanket statements that do not even attempt to understand why Deaf people are reacting in that way, nor the processes that led up to such behaviour. I’m not advocating tolerating bad behaviour at all, I’ve had my share, but unlike many deafies, I’ve actually done my homework, in order to UNDERSTAND the forces at play. The forces that shape us as people.
It’s not all bad, but it gets boring. If I read 100 Deaf blogs, I will get a sense of 100 distinct personalities. If I read 100 deaf blogs, I come away thinking, who are the people behind them? They look different, but they all think the same.
Then there is the same repetitive rubbish about integrating and mainstreaming as pertaining to being normal. There is a woeful lack of critical analysis and thinking about the oppression handed down by the hearing world. The focus on speech, hearing and integration, provides a convenient distraction from investigating such issues. Not much attempt is made to understand culture and the role it plays in determining our perspectives, how we approach our deafness and how we fit into the wider world. The assumption is to hear is normal, and everything follows on from that. It’s a variation on the God Made Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve argument.
As for the CI, that’s for another post, as I have been fortunate to delve into some personal myth busting, but for now, let’s meditate on Dianrez’s words:
My wish for the upcoming CI generation is to know that although they may have more options than the generations before them, they are still welcomed along with their families to the Deaf Community to make their own unique contributions, and that ASL is the way to ensure this resource is available to them. I hope they are not being fed incorrect information such as that Deaf people are limited, or living in a lonely world, or are deprived of opportunities. Nor that they are successful because of the CI. Nor that they have to meet the expectations of the Hearing community even if it does not mesh with their own capabilities. And my wish is for all d/Deaf people to unite in telling the hearing community to see us as capable individuals
Reading:





14 Comments, Comment or Ping
Anon
The clue is ‘Deaf.read’ what do you expect at a deaf aggregate ? Turnip appreciation ? We do have other interests we blog about them elsewhere. If you want the rest go to facebook, dedciated sites to what you want, and Twitter away there…. The UK aggregates, with the desire to promote trivia and talk not about deaf things, or run things like a private club did for them. The demand at deaf.read to talk deaf issues, are the very things MM identified in the UK wasn’t it, and which they wouldn’t back as I recall ?
Jun 17th, 2009
Anonymous
Tony, did you read any of the comments at DianRez’s blog? It was mentioned that the DeafRead aggregator only posts blogs that specifically mention deafness-related topics. Everything else gets relegated to the Extra page. That’s why it looks like we don’t talk about anything except being deaf. Lots of the bloggers and vloggers talk about other things on their v/blogs. when you find someone you like, you can peruse their other topics that don’t have anything to do with their being deaf. now, can you please find something else to whinge about?
Jun 18th, 2009
patti
kudos
we r more than the sum of our parts
dont know if u go to Deaf Video TV but there is a good thread re: a quote that begins the book – mask of benevolence
i think it is going a long way towards getting us to Examine the Unexamined
http://www.deafvideo.tv/video/watch/52726/
thanks for ur entry
peace
patti
Jun 18th, 2009
Tony Nicholas
Dear Anon & Anonymous
If you read my post, carefully, you would get it.
Also, you can write about deafness related topics without having to insert the deaf or Deaf word in every sentence. It’s all a matter of writing style.
If my blog is on the aggregator roll call, and people can assume that all blogs here are Deaf or deaf, then wouldn’t you safely assume that everything they write about is deafness related or even deafness informed?
Anonymous then why are u reading my blog, if u don’t like what I write about? To whinge about what other people are whingeing about perhaps?
Besides, I have made several other points in that post, which u have ignored in order to focus on my “whinging”. Besides MM doesn’t write or comment…. he moves the goal posts!
Jun 18th, 2009
Li-Li's Mom
Ah, well, we can’t all be as brilliant and deep as you, now
— you’ve really thrown the curve. But I do wonder how you devised the buckets of deaf vs. deaf and over what time frame you studied this imbalance of insight and personality across Deaf v. deaf sites? I took a quick looks at the list of deafread posts over the past couple of days and frankly couldn’t figure out who went into what pile — I just can’t tell most of my big D posters from little d posters. Is it ASL/BSL/Auslan vlogs vs. those who blog in English? Or is there another Litmus test of D v d that you are using to scan the group?
Jun 18th, 2009
Anonymous
I don’t necessarily like everything you write about, Tony, but usually find you entertaining and thought-provoking. Yes, you do have a tendency to whinge about things, but I *try* to keep an open mind and find your truth. Just one thing, though. Have you ever noticed that on DeafRead, some of the boxes showing the number of visits are faded gray, and others are blue? That’s because the gray ones are by hearing contributors, and the blue ones are by deaf contributors. just because a v/blog appears on DeafRead doesn’t mean the contributor is deaf.
You see “repetitive rubbish about integrating and mainstreaming as pertaining to being normal,” I see different people sharing their experiences. The stories might appear identical to you, but not to me. I read try to keep an open mind with them too. Not all deaf people are trying to integrate into the mainstream, or think hearing=normal. What you call a “woeful lack of critical analysis and thinking about the oppression handed down by the hearing world,” I think of as accentuating the positive and eliminating the negatives. The hearing world is neither all bad nor all good, and neither is the deaf world. “Not much attempt is made to understand culture and the role it plays in determining our perspectives, how we approach our deafness and how we fit into the wider world.” I see attempts everywhere on DeafRead.
Here’s a phrase I always liked from “Desiderata” by Max Ehrmann that I try to practice: Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, they too have their story.
Jun 18th, 2009
Anon
I’ve watched your ‘fight’ with MM on deaf.read for some time, I don’t know the background to it much, but it does seem MM has not reacted to any attacks from you despite a lot of provocation and blogs aimed at him very personally. Perhpas you don’t like being ignored ? That appears to us, you are the one perpetuating the problem. This MM reading as I can back on his blogging, he seems to have nothing now going back beyond January this year, not one has been aimed at you, even in retaliation. He does appear very diverse, in his blogging ?!! and not really one side or another. Some blogs I find a puzzle, but that is deaf people, we are all different.
Jun 18th, 2009
Tony
Dear Anon, I know MM from years back, on previous blogs of his, and in email groups, and other than the reference to MM now, and a couple of posts, I know his style, and I ignore him now…except when I get a bee in my bonnet. But even then, I have abstained many times.
As for my writing style, as entertaining as it is, and as fun as it is to write, there is only so much fairness I can muster, that bi-partisanship simply loses out.
Li-Li’s Mom, my criteria is not according to whether posts are done in English, Sign or video, but very much the angle that a blogger is writing from. The medical, hard of hearing viewpoint, as valid as it is, and as necessary as the information is, I cannae stomach much.
That preoccupation is very much a deaf domain. A person writing from a cultural perspective will have a different style of writing to those who write from a hearing impairment or disabled perspective.
But you know, Li-Li’s Mom, maybe it’s a post I need to write, that may shed light on my thinking????
Jun 18th, 2009
Anon
Brits sure carry grudge a long time Tony, I’d hate to get the wrong side of you. For two bloggers devoted to ignoring each other there’s a lot of unsaid ill-feeling around. When deaf fall out, they fall out Yeah ? Li-Li’s Mom has a point, you seem to want to provoke more than discuss at times… Takes all sort of folk… Cultural or Hearing Impaired, which are you ? both or neither ? hard to tell.
Jun 19th, 2009
Anonymous
I learned just yesterday from reading one of Li-Li’s Mom’s comments that she actually created the blog for Li-Li’s grandparents! and it sounded like it just struck recently that the whole rest of the world reads her blog and has opinions about it. So maybe if you understood what audience Li-Li’s Mom was writing for, then you understand the emphasis on the medical part about Li-Li’s implant. Li-Li’s mom then said that in the future, she would try to blog more about Li-Li’s life and less about the implant. I’m so looking forward to that, aren’t you? maybe not — I work at a school so children growing up with implants is something highly interesting to me.
Jun 19th, 2009
Tony
Anon, it’s good to provoke and make people think. But I’m not losing sleep over MM, or any other “adversity” for that matter. Simply acknowledge we don’t see eye to eye, MM is as blind to other people’s point of view as any of us! So nuff of the poor him!
Re: Li-Li Mom’s blog, I do understand that her blog is written with a particular audience in mind, and becasue it is publishe don the net, and is in the pucblic realm, others are gunna have an opinion abt it. Especially when u enable comments.
Having said that, I’m not commenting on individual blogs as much as looking at the narrative formed when you examine the blogosphere as a whole. You see particular perspectives, directions, discussions et al……
Jun 19th, 2009
Anon
Provoke sure Tony, your rebuttal blog was a little over the edge yeah ? offensive even ? Some people are sensitive, gotta respect that. G’day to ya !
Jun 19th, 2009
Tony
Anon, my blog posts are no more over th edge, offensive, than some of the other blogs out there that masquerade as liberal, bi-partisan, and enlightened.
Jun 20th, 2009